Saturday, October 26, 2013
Artists Take Up Digital Tools
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
XFR STN Offers a Digital Update at the New Museum
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: August 12, 2013
In an earlier version of this article, a quote by Gabe Tolliver misstated the group with which Melle Mel was affiliated. He was with Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five, not Sugar Hill Gang.
Saturday, August 10, 2013
Searching Big Data for ‘Digital Smoke Signals’
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
Embracing Tablets, Comic Book Publishers Cash In on a Digital Revolution
Monday, July 22, 2013
Vampire Diaries Comes to DC Digital
DC Digital held a panel at Comic-Con this year to discuss their digital initiatives. Expert moderator Bob Wayne got the ball rolling by pointing out that DC released a new digital first comic every day of the week.
First up, Derek Fridolf and Dustin Nguyen spoke about an upcoming issue of Lil’ Gotham, which would feature Gotham City’s own Comic-Con. They said the issue was a love letter to comic book fandom and would be tons of fun. “We don’t worry too much about stuff, we just have fun,” Fridolf said.
Writer Tom Taylor then talked about Injustice, the digital first series that serves as a prequel to the Injustice: Gods Among Us video game. “This book explains what happened and why Batman and Superman want to tear each other’s spins out,” Taylor said. He pointed out that he loved Superman and it tears him apart to write him so sinister and violent. The bestselling series will have an upcoming annual that featuring Harley Quinn fighting Lobo. “I just wanted to write an issue where Quinn beats up Lobo. That was my pitch,” Taylor laughed.
The panel then quickly touched on Batman ’66, which is the launch of the DC Squared initiative. Some art from upcoming issues was shown which featured Penguin and the Joker. “There’s a big fan base,” editor Jim Chadwick said. He said that many creators were reaching out to him and begging to work on the series. The panelist joked that they wanted to bring Batman ’66 into some of the other digital series, like a Lil’ Gotham ’66. The audience cheered loudly at this joke. Seriously, this needs to happen.
Kyle Higgins and Christos Gage discussed the DC Beyond Universe next. Higgins expressed how much he loved the Beyond series and what a big fan he was of the original cartoon series. Some artwork from the series was showed off and it featured Batman battling a Man-Bat. Gage then showed off some art from Justice League Beyond. “Can I say who the villain is?” Gage asked and was quickly told he couldn’t by nearby editors. “It’s an old Superman villain returned, that we can say.”
Hank Kanalz then announced that The Vampire Dairies would become a weekly digital first series. The series would include lots of threads setup by the television series. “We’re very excited about this,” Wayne said. The only artwork previewed for the new series was a cover which featured a drawing of the cast of the show. No further details were given, but Kanalz stressed that lots more news would be coming up regarding this new series.
Coming in November, Scooby-Doo Meets Batman and Robin would be launching. The panel stressed this was not a one shot, but rather a continuing, bi-monthly series. “This leaves the door open for the Royal Flush Gang vs. The Harlem Globetrotters, right?” Miller said to cheers from the crowd. “I want to write that,” he laughed.
Also coming up are Beware the Batman and Teen Titians GO! series. Both would be launching in the fall and follow the tone and stories of the new Cartoon Network television’s shows.
When the floor opened up to fan questions, an audience member asked about the recoloring of a Stephanie Brown character in the Halloween issue. The panel deftly dodged the question and instead focused on the proper coloring of peppers in the comic.
Benjamin is a writer and storyteller. He owns many leather-bound books and his office smells of rich mahogany. Follow Benjamin on Twitter @616Earth, or find him on IGN.
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Gadgetwise Blog: Training From a Difficult Digital Coach
FX-Sport VR1 Programmable Personal Trainer Headphones are a smart concept — a pair of headphones that have a built-in coach. But the coach could be easier to work with.
The FX-Sport is an on-the-ear-style headphone with a springy wire that runs behind the neck and curls up for storage. You can buy an accessory silicone cover to use the headphones when swimming as well.
The FX-Sport can be used in a few ways: to play music stored on its eight-megabyte internal drive; to allow a user to run against a virtual opponent while listening to music; or to set up audible instructions, say for interval training, for when to sprint and when to rest.
The value of racing a pretend competitor is pretty well established. In a test in England, cyclists exceeded their previous limits when faced with a virtual opponent.
Because the virtual opponent runs against the clock — there is no GPS — it can spur increased effort even on treadmills and stationary bikes.
The idea is terrific, but the setup had problems.
To use the headphones you have to download software for them to work with an Apple computer or PC. I used a Mac, and the software was easy enough to download.
On my test unit, music came preloaded. And it worked well. But I found it difficult to load my own music because each song must be selected individually from a music library. For me, sorting through 10,000 songs for the 100 or so I might want would take too much work. If you have a group of songs listed consecutively, you can grab them as a group and move them to the device.
Once I had loaded some of my music, I had some trouble playing it. Duncan Walsh of Mi-Sport Global, the company behind the FX-Sport, said the problem might have been with a song in my folder — that it was either corrupted or copy-protected. “The only digital music files that cannot be played on the FX-Sport are DRM-protected files,” said Mr. Walsh, referring to files that cannot be copied.
The “race mode” was easy enough to set up. I entered my name and that of an imaginary competitor, then set the range of time for the competitor’s finish. The competitor can change speeds, so he could challenge a comfortable lead with a sprint finish. I set it slightly faster and slightly slower than my typical finish. The program would pick a random finish time within that range. You tap the headphone control to hear your opponent’s progress.
In “pace mode,” you choose a finish time for the opponent, who plods at a steady speed to the finish at that exact time.
The programmable trainer lets you write custom messages that a computerized voice reads back at the times you set. So you can have it tell you “go” for a 20-second sprint, followed by “rest” for 10 seconds over a four-minute period, for instance. It worked, but required a couple of tries to get right.
At a price of $190, the headphone may be in the race, but it has to improve its performance for a podium finish.
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Bits Blog: A Digital Diaper for Tracking Children’s Health
A screen shot from Pixie Scientific’s Web site, showing its diapers and accompanying smartphone app that can transmit certain health information to a physician.Talk about changing with the times.
A New York start-up called Pixie Scientific has developed a diaper that the company says can detect possible urinary tract infections, kidney dysfunctions, and dehydration, accompanied by a smartphone app that can transmit the information to a physician.
“I was driving with my wife and daughter one day, when my wife asked if the baby had wet herself,” said Yaroslav Faybishenko, Pixie’s founder. “I realized she was sitting in data.”
Other so-called quantified self products have been developed for adults, like products from Jawbone and FitBit that create digital records of calorie expenditure and sleep habits. At this year’s Consumer Electronics Show, a Taiwanese company called AiQ showed off shirts that it said could measure things like heart rate and other biometric signals.
In contrast to those things, the technology behind the diaper is relatively simple, and it owes as much to the quality of smartphone cameras as it does to clever chemistry.
At the front of the diaper is a patch with several colored squares. Each square represents a different interaction with a protein, water content or bacteria, and changes color if it detects something is outside of normal parameters. There is also a neutral white square, to more easily check for color changes in the other squares.
A smartphone app takes a picture and can make precise readings of the chemical data based on color changes. The data is uploaded to a central location, where physicians can get information about how the child is doing and whether the baby needs further testing.
The diaper is expected to be tested at Benioff Children’s Hospital of the University of California, San Francisco this September. Columbia University’s children’s hospital is considering a similar study. If successful, the product may then be submitted to the Food and Drug Administration for final approval.
Mr. Faybishenko said he thought the diaper, which he said would cost about 30 percent more than regular diapers, had potential as a consumer product, for parents who want to keep regular tabs on their child’s health. Rather than overwhelming parents with data, the app is likely to let them know whether they should see a pediatrician for one or more possible conditions. With the parents’ permission, the detailed urine analysis data could be sent to a doctor’s office.
“You really don’t want to overload parents with data they don’t understand,” he said. “Eventually the quantified self idea will be mostly silent and unobtrusive, just something inside the existing flow of life.”
Mr. Faybishenko said the company was working on other tests, but would not specify what they were.
Sunday, June 30, 2013
Gadgetwise: Scanning a Signature for Digital Documents
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Digital Diary: Instagram Video and the Death of Fantasy
Sunday, May 26, 2013
Gadgetwise Blog: Tip of the Week: Touring the Library of Congress Digital Collections
American history buffs who do not have the time or money to travel to Washington can find plenty to browse – for free — on the Library of Congress Web site. Digitized sound recordings from the National Jukebox Project, archival newspapers and thousands of photographs are there for viewing, with many available items for download. Other sections of the site host classic posters from the Works Progress Administration, a collection of 2,100 early baseball cards and a “Show Music on Record” database that catalogs musical recordings. With Memorial Day just ahead, the Veteran’s History Project, which collects and preserves the personal stories of American war veterans, may also be of particular interest.
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Innovation: Who Made That Digital Camouflage?
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Hearst Hires Troy Young as Digital Media Chief
Monday, May 6, 2013
Enstitute, an Alternative to College for a Digital Elite
Thursday, May 2, 2013
Digital Subscribers Buoy Newspaper Circulation
Monday, April 22, 2013
From GoalControl, a Digital Eye to Watch Over Soccer’s Trouble Spots
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: April 20, 2013
A photo caption with an earlier version of this article misstated the name of one of the men pictured. The man on the right is Björn Lindner, not Rene Beaujean.
Digital Domain: Apps Help Find Online Workers Quickly
Randall Stross is an author based in Silicon Valley and a professor of business at San Jose State University. E-mail: stross@nytimes.com.
Friday, April 12, 2013
Bits Blog: Google Introduces a Tool for Planning for Your Digital Afterlife
One of the most haunting questions facing Web companies and their users is, what happens to the stuff of our digital lives after we die?
Are our Facebook status updates, Flickr photos and Gmail messages like physical journals and photo albums for our families to flip through? Should our iTunes playlists be like records passed down through generations? Would we rest easier knowing that our digital lives would exist for eternity, or that our private postings would stay that way?
On Thursday, Google announced a new tool for managing your digital afterlife. Google users can choose whether they want their information deleted or to name a beneficiary, as in a will. Users can have different directives for different products — deleting Gmail and Drive but sharing Picasa and YouTube content, for instance.
“We hope that this new feature will enable you to plan your digital afterlife — in a way that protects your privacy and security — and make life easier for your loved ones after you’re gone,” Andreas Tuerk, a Google product manager, wrote on the company’s public policy blog.
Google users choose whether to activate the feature after their accounts are inactive for three, six, nine or 12 months. Google will send a text message and e-mail before taking any action. The feature, called Inactive Account Manager, is accessible on the account settings page.
Before, survivors could gain access to data stored with Google only with a court order, and that was rare.
Google introduced the feature as states begin to pass laws about what happens to digital remains. Federal privacy laws do not generally address the issue, but Congress is considering it. Google often says it prefers technological solutions to legislative ones.
Other companies are also thinking about the issue. Facebook has grappled with how to confirm that users have died — so the site doesn’t suggest becoming friends with them, for instance — and how to handle it when survivors use a deceased person’s page as a memorial.
And Evernote is working on Evernote Century, which would guarantee that information stored on Evernote is accessible for 100 years and let people designate who can have access to it, even if Evernote goes out of business.
Of course, if we reach the Singularity, as many in the tech world believe we will, we will not need these tools because we will all live forever.
DealBook: Never Mind Facebook; Winklevoss Twins Rule in Digital Money
The Winklevoss twins, Cameron and Tyler — Olympic rowers, nemeses of Mark Zuckerberg — are laying claim to a new title: bitcoin moguls.
The Winklevii, as they are known, have amassed since last summer what appears to be one of the single largest portfolios of the digital money, whose wild gyrations have Silicon Valley and Wall Street talking. The twins, the first prominent figures in the largely anonymous bitcoin world to publicly disclose a big stake, say they own nearly $11 million worth.
Or at least $11 million as of Thursday morning — when trading was temporarily suspended after the latest and largest flash crash left a single bitcoin worth about $120 and the whole market worth $1.3 billion. At one point, the price had plummeted 60 percent.
To skeptics, the frenzy over the bitcoin network created by anonymous programmers in 2009 looks more like the mania for Dutch tulip bulbs in the 1600s than the beginnings of an actual currency.
“To say highly speculative would be the understatement of the century,” said Steve Hanke, a professor specializing in alternative currencies at Johns Hopkins University.
Whatever else it is, bitcoin has become the financial phenomenon of the moment.
In addition to the identical twins, Silicon Valley investment firms, while not holding bitcoins, are starting to show interest in the technology.
On Thursday, a group of venture capitalists, including Andreessen Horowitz, announced that they were financing a bitcoin-related company, OpenCoin.
Sean Gallup/Getty ImagesA sticker on the window of a pub in Berlin signifies acceptance of bitcoin for payment. Few places accept the digital currency.
The New York TimesThe Winklevosses say this week’s tumult is just growing pains for a digital currency that they believe will become a sort of gold for the technorati.
“People say it’s a Ponzi scheme, it’s a bubble,” said Cameron Winklevoss. “People really don’t want to take it seriously. At some point that narrative will shift to ‘virtual currencies are here to stay.’ We’re in the early days.”
While little is known about the creator of bitcoin, or if it even was a single person, the work involved serious programming chops, building a system that could live on borrowed computer space around the world. It was determined that only a finite number of bitcoins could be created — the count is currently around 11 million. New coins are “mined” by programmers who solve mathematic riddles and can sell their coins on upstart exchanges.
For now, there are few places where bitcoins can be used. One marketplace is an online bazaar, Silk Road, where narcotics are reportedly the main wares for sale. But bitcoin believers imagine a future where the e-cash can be used at their local Starbucks. The Winklevosses have paid in bitcoin for the services of a Ukrainian computer programmer who has worked on their Web site.
“We have elected to put our money and faith in a mathematical framework that is free of politics and human error,” Tyler Winklevoss said.
This is not the brothers’ first gamble on an unproved technology. As students at Harvard, the twins founded a social networking site, ConnectU, and enlisted their schoolmate, Mark Zuckerberg, to help them build the company. After Mr. Zuckerberg went off to start Facebook, the brothers sued him, accusing him of stealing their idea — a story that was dramatized in the movie “The Social Network.” The case was settled with the brothers being given $20 million in cash and Facebook shares that are now worth more than $200 million.
They have parlayed that fortune into Winklevoss Capital. Their first two investments were in Hukkster, a start-up shopping Web site and SumZero, an online community for professional money managers.
The brothers began dabbling in bitcoin last summer when the dollar value of a single coin was still in the single digits. To keep their holdings secure from hackers, they have taken the complex codes that represent their holdings off networked computers and saved them on small flash drives, putting the drives, in turn, in safe deposit boxes at banks in three different cities.
It’s hard to verify how the Winklevoss holdings compare with other bitcoin players, given the anonymity of accounts, and the twins say they believe that some early users of the system probably have holdings that are at least as large.
A Maltese company, Exante, started a hedge fund that the company says has bought up about 82,000 bitcoins — or about $10 million as of Thursday — with money from wealthy investors. A founder of the fund, Anatoli Knyazev, said his main concern was hackers and government regulators, who have so far mostly left the currency alone.
These investments were all in an uncertain state on Thursday after the big price swings and the shutdown of trading on Mt. Gox, a Japanese-based company that claims to handle 80 percent of all bitcoin trades. Mt. Gox said in a statement that the problems were a result of the currency’s popularity, making it impossible to process all the incoming orders. It added that it was not the victim of hackers but “instead victim of our own success!”
The 6-foot-5 Winklevoss brothers were unfazed. The brothers said they took advantage of the low prices to buy more.
“It has been four years and it has yet to be discredited as a viable alternative to fiat currency,” Tyler Winklevoss said. “We could be totally wrong, but we are curious to see this play out a lot more.”
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Digital Domain: Wearable Video Cameras, for Police Officers
Randall Stross is an author based in Silicon Valley and a professor of business at San Jose State University. E-mail: stross@nytimes.com.