Showing posts with label Benefit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Benefit. Show all posts

Friday, July 5, 2013

Asia Chip Makers Stand to Benefit From Move to Cut-Price Gadgets

Manufacturers, including Toshiba and SK Hynix, are poised to reap the rewards of soaring demand for cut-price tablets and smartphones in China, the world’s biggest smartphone market, and the emergence of Chinese mobile device makers like Huawei Technologies.

At the high end of the spectrum, demand for gadgets armed with ever-greater memory capacity will bolster chip sales even if the market for relatively expensive handsets does not see the kind of rapid growth it has in the past.

All of this, combined with reduced investment since 2011, means the prices of dynamic random access memory and NAND memory chips have started to rise, and chip makers are enjoying the most bargaining power they have had in years.

“Chip makers are reaping the benefits of curtailed investment of recent years just when demand is exploding,” said Hong Sung-ho, an analyst at I’M Investment & Securities.

Chip makers had little bargaining power until early last year as Apple and Samsung were the sole major buyers of the NAND chips used in mobile devices. The two global heavyweights focus on the high-end market and they are now struggling with slowing growth as this profitable segment nears saturation.

China is driving the industry’s rapid shift to cheaper smartphones, helping chip makers broaden their customer base. Additionally, the growth of Chinese smartphone makers like Huawei, ZTE Corp. and Lenovo is threatening to weaken the dominance of Apple and Samsung.

About 70 percent of China’s smartphone shipments are sold at 1,000 renminbi, or about $160, or less, while 10 percent are in the 1,000 to 3,000 renminbi range. Supercheap tablets costing less than $100 are also soaking up supply.

“The size of the Apple order was a big price swing factor, but now demand from Chinese manufacturers is more than offsetting this volatility,” said the HMC Investment Securities analyst Greg Nho.

Prices of DRAM chips, used mainly in computers, have leaped nearly 90 percent so far this year even as PC sales have plummeted, while the market for NAND memory chips has tightened.

Outside of China, demand for NAND chips is increasing as consumers need more memory capacity to play high-quality video and music on higher-priced gadgets.

“In the old days, we only took a few photographs. Now we take videos as well, at potentially higher resolutions,” said Damian Thong, director of research at Macquarie Capital Securities in Tokyo. “I actually think the opportunity for NAND flash is enormous still.”

For example, HTC’s flagship smartphone, the HTC One, has NAND memory capacity of 64 gigabytes, four times more than that of most other high-end models.

The second-largest NAND manufacturer, Toshiba, said Tuesday that it would expand a production facility in Japan with an investment of nearly ¥30 billion, or $300 million. Samsung, the world’s leading producer of the chips, is building a $7 billion NAND plant in China.

Micron Technology, which is looking to complete the acquisition of the bankrupt Japanese chip maker Elpida Memory before the end of August, plans to increase investment in 2014 as it integrates with the Japanese company.

But even as some chip makers bolster investment for the first time in years, few believe the market is heading for a glut. Indeed, memory chip makers’ total capital spending this year is set to decrease by 2.6 percent to $12.3 billion, according to HMC Investment Securities.

Most manufacturers are keeping investment to a small scale as they prepare for the arrival of three-dimensional chip engineering, a major technological leap from the current planar structure.

Mr. Thong, of Macquarie, said demand for NAND chips would continue to outstrip supply, even with the new production facilities in the pipeline.

“Memory prices and memory profitability will remain high for the next 12 months,” he said.

Samsung has become conservative in recent years, a departure from its traditional approach of keeping rivals at bay by not allowing profitability to get too high.

“By creating an oversupply situation, Samsung was able to keep memory competitors weak,” Mark Newman, a research analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein, said in a report Tuesday. “Today, however, that strategy of lower memory chip prices actually just helps Samsung’s handset and tablet competitors. Samsung is thus becoming highly motivated to generate memory shortages and high memory pricing.”

Samsung is the world’s top NAND chip maker with about 38 percent of the market, followed by Toshiba, which has a 28 percent share, and SK Hynix, with 13 percent.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Shortcuts: Companies See Benefit of Time Away From Mobile Devices

MOST people I know feel too connected — not to family or friends, but to electronic devices like smartphones and computers. They feel a need to check e-mails, texts and social networks almost constantly on the off chance that an emergency has popped up in the last five minutes that they absolutely, positively have to address.

Most people I know also would like to feel less connected to those devices. They realize that they could go an hour or a day — or (gasp!) even longer — without going online, but two things prevent it: constantly checking our texts and e-mails has become like a tic, or a hard habit to break; and most of us feel that if everyone else is available 24 hours, then we have to be, too.

“Some industries are so highly volatile that people need to be connected all the time, but most of us overexaggerate our own importance,” said Dalton Conley, dean for the social services at New York University and author of “Elsewhere” (Pantheon, 2009).

“Then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy — if we’re always available, then we’re expected to always be available.”

But, as Professor Conley added, companies are increasingly realizing that employees need to be disconnected from time to time and that “giving workers time to chill helps ultimate long-term productivity.”

But the question arises: Is this something we can do unilaterally as individuals or do we need some sort of corporate shift that acknowledges and addresses the burnout of always being on call?

“It’s very hard to turn off by yourself,” said Leslie A. Perlow, a professor of leadership at Harvard Business School and author of “Sleeping With Your Smartphone” (Harvard Business Review Press, 2012).

Professor Perlow did a survey of 1,600 managers and professionals and found that only 2 percent turned off their devices, even while on vacation. But Professor Perlow discovered during her research that organizational change, even on a relatively small scale, could make a huge difference.

She did an experiment with a six-person team at the Boston Consulting Group.

Each team member would have a night off a week, starting about 6 p.m., when they would be unreachable electronically. There also was a weekly team discussion about how the process was working.

Not everyone was happy to participate. Although the workers could each choose their night off, many of them — at least at first — didn’t want to take it.

“Some said they didn’t know what they would do with a night off,” she said.

There was a safety net. The team member covering for the out-of-pocket employee would receive any e-mails and assess whether they were urgent.

If it was a rare, real emergency and no other team member could handle it, then the worker taking the night off would be called.

When everyone was on board, the process worked far better and with more positive results than Professor Perlow expected. Team members felt empowered and expressed increased satisfaction with work and their work-life balance. They started scrutinizing operations, like whether their travel schedules might be shifted to make their lives more relaxed and productive.

“We were surprised — we didn’t go in expecting to get that result,” she said. “People were more engaged, were prioritizing and talking more.”

Professor Perlow replicated the pilot program several times at the Boston Consulting Group and has now expanded it to 14 countries with more than 1,000 teams. She stressed, however, that it was not enough to take the time off. Employees also need the element of group discussion to “collectively rethink how to do work.”

Other companies have tackled the problem as well.

At the beginning of 2012, Volkswagen reached an agreement with a small portion of its work force to stop the e-mail server for employees who used BlackBerrys 30 minutes after their shift ended and restore it half an hour before work began the next day.

Sunday, July 15, 2012

Shortcuts: Companies See Benefit of Time Away From Mobile Devices

MOST people I know feel too connected — not to family or friends, but to electronic devices like smartphones and computers. They feel a need to check e-mails, texts and social networks almost constantly on the off chance that an emergency has popped up in the last five minutes that they absolutely, positively have to address.

Most people I know also would like to feel less connected to those devices. They realize that they could go an hour or a day — or (gasp!) even longer — without going online, but two things prevent it: constantly checking our texts and e-mails has become like a tic, or a hard habit to break; and most of us feel that if everyone else is available 24 hours, then we have to be, too.

“Some industries are so highly volatile that people need to be connected all the time, but most of us overexaggerate our own importance,” said Dalton Conley, dean for the social services at New York University and author of “Elsewhere” (Pantheon, 2009).

“Then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy — if we’re always available, then we’re expected to always be available.”

But, as Professor Conley added, companies are increasingly realizing that employees need to be disconnected from time to time and that “giving workers time to chill helps ultimate long-term productivity.”

But the question arises: Is this something we can do unilaterally as individuals or do we need some sort of corporate shift that acknowledges and addresses the burnout of always being on call?

“It’s very hard to turn off by yourself,” said Leslie A. Perlow, a professor of leadership at Harvard Business School and author of “Sleeping With Your Smartphone” (Harvard Business Review Press, 2012).

Professor Perlow did a survey of 1,600 managers and professionals and found that only 2 percent turned off their devices, even while on vacation. But Professor Perlow discovered during her research that organizational change, even on a relatively small scale, could make a huge difference.

She did an experiment with a six-person team at the Boston Consulting Group.

Each team member would have a night off a week, starting about 6 p.m., when they would be unreachable electronically. There also was a weekly team discussion about how the process was working.

Not everyone was happy to participate. Although the workers could each choose their night off, many of them — at least at first — didn’t want to take it.

“Some said they didn’t know what they would do with a night off,” she said.

There was a safety net. The team member covering for the out-of-pocket employee would receive any e-mails and assess whether they were urgent.

If it was a rare, real emergency and no other team member could handle it, then the worker taking the night off would be called.

When everyone was on board, the process worked far better and with more positive results than Professor Perlow expected. Team members felt empowered and expressed increased satisfaction with work and their work-life balance. They started scrutinizing operations, like whether their travel schedules might be shifted to make their lives more relaxed and productive.

“We were surprised — we didn’t go in expecting to get that result,” she said. “People were more engaged, were prioritizing and talking more.”

Professor Perlow replicated the pilot program several times at the Boston Consulting Group and has now expanded it to 14 countries with more than 1,000 teams. She stressed, however, that it was not enough to take the time off. Employees also need the element of group discussion to “collectively rethink how to do work.”

Other companies have tackled the problem as well.

At the beginning of 2012, Volkswagen reached an agreement with a small portion of its work force to stop the e-mail server for employees who used BlackBerrys 30 minutes after their shift ended and restore it half an hour before work began the next day.