Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Nokia Unveils Low-Priced Phones
Monday, February 25, 2013
DealBook: In Apple Fight, Einhorn Unveils ‘iPrefs’
4:30 p.m. | Updated Apple Inc. has introduced more innovative consumer products than perhaps any other company has in the last decade: the iPod, the iPhone, the iPad.
Eduardo Munoz/ReutersDavid Einhorn, presidentNow the hedge fund manager David Einhorn wants the company to roll out what he calls iPrefs, which he says could produce $61 a share in additional benefits for investors.
It’s a cutesy name for the class of perpetual preferred shares that Mr. Einhorn has called on the technology giant to roll out as a way to deliver more cash to its shareholders. And for over an hour on Thursday, Mr. Einhorn, the president of the hedge fund Greenlight Capital, patiently walked listeners through his argument about why those securities made the most sense for returning the company’s $137 billion cash hoard to what he said were its rightful owners.
Flipping through a voluminous PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Einhorn argued that his idea bore merit and deserved shareholder support. He also explained how iPrefs work: Apple would issue one preferred share, carrying a quarterly dividend of 50 cents each, for each outstanding common share.
He conceded that the idea was unusual. But he argued that it was a fresh way to reward shareholders while letting Apple hold on to a still-substantial “rainy day” fund.
“We know they embrace innovation and can recognize it when they see it, even if it isn’t the kind of innovation people usually think of when they think of Apple,” Mr. Einhorn said.
“We hope Apple agrees with us when we say that iPrefs are an innovative idea whose time has come,” he added
The conference call came after several current investors in Apple and a former one in Greenlight called on Mr. Einhorn to halt his fight, which has included suing Apple for what the hedge fund manager called an improper bundling of several shareholder initiatives. The proposal on Apple’s proxy includes the elimination of the company’s ability to issue preferred shares without shareholder consent.
The California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the big pension fund, has urged shareholders to support the so-called Proposal 2, arguing that it actually promotes good corporate governance.
“I came off the call deeply puzzled,” Anne Simpson, the pension fund’s director of global governance, told DealBook in an interview after the call. “He finished off by saying you should vote against Proposal 2 to send a message, but he’s in court trying to prevent Proposal 2 from going ahead.
Calpers had been actively soliciting shareholder support for the corporate governance changes since before Mr. Einhorn filed his suit and believes the proposal will pass handily.
Ms. Simpson is undecided about the merits of the hedge fund manager’s idea, but she took issue with the idea of a big, distracting fight with a company that has already said publicly that it was considering the concept.
“This is really about proper conduct,” she said. “I don’t feel happy that activist funds can use disruptive tactics when the company says that they’re listening and willing to meet.”
And Richard Clayton, the research director of the CtW Investment Group, which represents several unions’ pension funds, added, “What we heard on the call was David Einhorn acknowledge that Proposal 2 does advance shareholder rights.”
A Federal District Court judge is weighing issuing a preliminary injunction on Apple’s shareholder vote on Feb. 27, as he prepares a ruling on whether Apple violated securities rules. The judge, Richard J. Sullivan, has indicated that Mr. Einhorn’s lawsuit appears likely to succeed as a matter of law.
David Einhorns Apple Inc. iPrefs Presentation by
Thursday, October 25, 2012
State of the Art: Microsoft Unveils the Surface, Its First Tablet - Review
Saturday, August 4, 2012
Bits Blog: Twitter Unveils the Twindex, a New Political Index
screenshot via TwitterWe’ve seen it dozens of times before. The famous scene of a political candidate in a large room, balloons floating and banners strewn about, surrounded by supporters and family, anxiously watching the television as the election results come in.
This year’s election might look a little different. The TV may be blaring results, but the presidential candidates’ staffs may also be following the Twitter Political Index, a new feature that monitors political sentiment on Twitter.
Adam Sharp, head of government, news and social innovation at Twitter, said in a phone interview that the new Twitter Index, or Twindex, monitors hundreds of millions of Twitter messages searching for opinions and views about both 2012 presidential candidates.
The messages are then sorted by what people are saying about President Obama or Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, and then creates a poll of those views.
The new site, housed at election.twitter.com, will be updated each day at 8 p.m., Eastern time, to reflect the latest daily views about the candidates.
The Twindex is not meant to replace traditional polls, Mr. Sharp said, but rather to offer an additional, real-time view of the nation’s feelings about candidates as they appear in the news and as voters try to decide which candidate they want to run the country for the next four years.
screenshot via Twitter and TopsyThe Twitter Political Index, as compared to the traditional Gallup Poll.“We believe the Twitter political index reinforces the transitional models of research,” explained Mr. Sharp. “By providing more signals, more dials — that can agree or disagree — these new technologies give a more complete picture of crafting a political forecast.”
On a company blog post, Twitter said the Twindex was built in partnership with a data analysis team from Topsy, an online search and analytics company, and two polling firms, the Mellman Group and North Star Opinion Research.
Topsy sifts through Twitter messages and uses advanced semantic analysis software to determine if someone is in support of a candidate, or a detractor.
Mr. Sharp said the index had a database of thousand of words to understand if these Twitter messages were for or against a candidate. As these messages are being shared by millions of people on Twitter, the software also takes into account colloquialisms.
Mr. Sharp noted that “bad,” for instance, could mean bad, or it be slang for good. He said that Topsy could differentiate between these words in a sentence and if they are positive or negative.
This is not the first time Twitter has worked on a presidential election Web site.
In 2008, during the last election, the company built a site that corralled all the Twitter messages about the candidates. But things have definitely changed in the last four years. In the last election, Twitter users sent 1.8 million messages on the day of the election. Today, with people sending 400 million messages on a typical day, that represents a little over six minutes of Twitter volume.