Showing posts with label British. Show all posts
Showing posts with label British. Show all posts

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Bits Blog: Eric Schmidt of Google to Meet With British Prime Minister

Given the grilling that Google has gotten this week in Parliament, you might think that Eric Schmidt, the executive chairman of the company, would be persona non grata in London these days.

Not so, it appears. Mr. Schmidt is one of 16 high-level corporate executives who have been invited to meet with Prime Minister David Cameron next week. They are members of the Business Advisory Group, which regularly gathers at Mr. Cameron’s office to bat around economic issues.

While the talks are private, it is a safe bet that nobody at No. 10 Downing Street will call Mr. Schmidt “devious,” “unethical” or “evil” – at least not to his face. Those are just some of the terms that Margaret Hodge, chairwoman of the Public Accounts Committee of Parliament, used to describe Google during hearings this week on the strategies that multinational companies employ to minimize their taxes.

Ms. Hodge and other lawmakers are upset that Google paid only £6 million in corporate taxes in Britain in 2011, despite generating more than £3 billion in revenue there. Google, which reduces its tax bill in Britain and other European countries by routing sales via Ireland, where corporate taxes are lower, insists that the practice is perfectly legal.

A Downing Street official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said taxation would indeed be included in the discussions of the Business Advisory Group on Monday, which will focus on preparations for the Group of 8 summit meeting next month in Northern Ireland. “Nothing is off the table,” this person said.

“The prime minister has made it very clear that having strong international standards to make sure that global companies, like anyone else, pay the taxes they owe is a priority for the G-8 summit,” Mr. Cameron’s office said in a statement.

In addition to Mr. Schmidt, the advisory group includes prominent chief executives like Vittorio Colao of Vodafone, Tom Enders of EADS and Angela Ahrendts of Burberry. It has been meeting quarterly for more than two years.

One person familiar with Mr. Schmidt’s agenda said he planned to be in London for a number of events next week and would attend the meeting of the advisory group. Mr. Schmidt sits on the council in a “private capacity,” not as an official Google representative, this person added.

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Off the Shelf: ‘Exposure,’ the Story of a British Whistle-Blower in Japan

Barely a year later, Mr. Woodford, a Briton who spent his career rising through Olympus’s ranks, has produced a memoir of the scandal, “Exposure — Inside the Olympus Scandal: How I Went From C.E.O. to Whistle-Blower” (Portfolio, $27.95).

One could be forgiven for meager expectations. This book was written quickly, and by a chief executive with no professional writing experience and no co-author. Yet “Exposure” is a cut above many C.E.O. memoirs, and is at least equal to most business-scandal books you are likely to find. It is also a harsh indictment of the clubby and unquestioning ways that still flourish in some quarters of the Japanese corporate world.

At its best, especially in the first half of the book, Mr. Woodford’s story is as suspenseful as a minor John Grisham novel. It begins last year, barely four months after his elevation to president when, after a long day of meetings at Olympus’s European headquarters in Hamburg, he opens an e-mail sent by one of his aides in Tokyo. It contains an article from a Japanese business magazine called Facta, contending that Olympus had been spending hundreds of millions of dollars on questionable and money-losing acquisitions.

When Mr. Woodford rushes back to Tokyo, he expects to find the company in an uproar. What he finds instead is business as usual. He asks two executives if they have seen the article. Yes, they acknowledge, they have. Then why, he asks, hadn’t they told him about it sooner? Because Olympus’s chairman, Tsuyoshi Kikukawa, told them not to, they answer. When Mr. Woodford confronts the imperious Mr. Kikukawa about the matter, Mr. Kikukawa brushes off the whole matter as insignificant and unworthy of his attention.

Though the two men had been close, Mr. Woodford paints a devastating portrait of Mr. Kikukawa as vainglorious and ignorant of product details.

“While it was often patently obvious he didn’t understand what he was talking about, my colleagues never dared expose this,” he writes. “I quickly learned that no one ever asked why the emperor wasn’t wearing clothes.” When the two men were photographed together for a corporate portrait, Mr. Kikukawa stood on a box to minimize the obvious height differential.

It turns out that no one at Olympus wants to explain to Mr. Woodford the first thing about the acquisitions in question, much less dig into the Facta allegations. Alarmed, Mr. Woodford brings in Ernst & Young to investigate.

At a subsequent board meeting, one Japanese director criticizes him about bringing “outsiders” in. Mr. Woodford writes: “His message was clear to me: Olympus was a family, and families require loyalty.”

The author adds: “It reminded me of the speech Michael Corleone delivered to his hapless brother Fredo when he disagreed with him in front of the Las Vegas crowd in ‘The Godfather.’ ”

Three days later, a nattily dressed Mr. Kikukawa calls another board meeting, at which point Mr. Woodford is fired. “I stared at Kikukawa: at the cut of his expensive suit, at the precision of the knot in that silk tie, at the curt, pinched smile that played beneath his nose,” the author writes. “He struck me as a ludicrous figure, and so delusional. He resembled little more than the captain of a sinking ship who believed that by throwing out the dead weight, his vessel would suddenly right itself and resume its calm drift toward the horizon.”

Mr. Woodford is escorted from the building, at which point he decides to go public, igniting a storm of controversy. He holds news conferences and appears on news programs in New York, London and Tokyo, coming away with a new appreciation for the Fourth Estate. The Olympus board tries to fight back, and here one sees vividly the ways that some sectors of corporate Japan are still firmly mired in the last century — well, make that the 19th century. In such circles, executives may have little sense of how transparency has transformed international business.

The books loses much of its energy about two-thirds of the way through, when the $1.7 billion cover-up is finally and fully explained; after that, the writing is on the wall. It turns out that after a currency devaluation in the 1980s, Olympus, like any number of Japanese corporations, found ways to hide the resulting losses. Looking to right itself, Olympus engaged in risky derivative trades that its senior executives barely understood, leading to still larger losses.

Eventually, a complex scheme was devised to inflate the purchase price of three nonsensical acquisitions; the extra money was then channeled back to Olympus — in one case, via a titanic $687 million “advisory fee” — erasing the hidden losses.

This fall, Mr. Kikukawa and two other former executives pleaded guilty over charges related to the accounting cover-up.

MR. WOODFORD has emerged as a hero, named by at least one British newspaper as its 2011 executive of the year. And rightly so. His gift for candor, so evident as a whistle-blower, serves him well as a memoirist. He acknowledges that at the depths of the scandal, he took to self-medicating with alcohol; he wakes up with a bad hangover more than once in this book’s pages.

About the worst one can say about “Exposure” is that Mr. Woodford can come off as preachy and a tad self-righteous at times. But after all that Olympus and its board put him through, it’s probably fair to say he deserves a bit of time on his soapbox.

Thursday, July 19, 2012

British Close Case on Climate E-mails, With No Suspects

The investigation by the unit, the Norfolk Constabulary, into the data leak concluded that the hacking was a “sophisticated and carefully orchestrated attack” on the university’s digital data files by an unknown outsider operating remotely online. The police put to rest speculation that the release was the work of a mischievous or disgruntled insider at the university’s Climatic Research Unit.

The leak in November 2009 set off a battle over the integrity of some of the world’s leading climate scientists and their research. Some of the e-mails contained provocative language about those who question the prevailing scientific view that the global climate is heating up because of the burning of fossil fuels and other human activities.

Climate change doubters called the release Climategate and demanded an investigation into the academic honesty of the e-mails’ authors and their research. A half-dozen such inquiries, in Britain and the United States, largely cleared the scientists of wrongdoing, but in some cases chided the authors for an intemperate tone.

The senior police investigator, Detective Chief Superintendent Julian Gregory, said that despite an exhaustive two-and-a-half-year inquiry, the police did not have a realistic prospect of finding the offender or offenders.

“The international dimension of investigating the World Wide Web especially has proved extremely challenging,” Chief Gregory said. “The offenders used methods common in unlawful Internet activity to obstruct inquiries.”

Edward Acton, the vice chancellor of the university, said he was disappointed that no one had been brought to justice for the hacking, which he said “did real harm to public perceptions about the dangers of climate change.”